BasinWise — Dependency & Reliability Intelligencerelease v1 · genome v1 · run run_water_rights_v133 signals92,201 instances
Overview / Signals / Decree-to-current-use conflict / siginst_ep_wr_20260718_decree-use-conflict_5749

Decree-to-current-use conflict

verifiedSETTLERS DITCH

77 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.

Priority
42.9
composite 0–100
Raw score
61.3
detector output 0–100
Confidence
0.82
0–1
Observed
2026-07-18
12:00:00
Priority componentsweights: impact .30 · urgency .25 · confidence .20 · freshness .15 · novelty .10
impact0.00
urgency0.50
confidence0.82
freshness0.50
novelty0.65
Record payloadcustomer_payload — everything the detector carried
wdid
6400508
state
CO
county
SEDGWICK
acreage
77
latitude
40.950027
right_id
6400508-17846.17514
longitude
-102.518967
parcel_id
08115-81107010
county_fips
08115
identifiers
{"wdid":"6400508","parcel_id":"08115-81107010"}
parcel_owner
YOSHIMOTO FAMILY FARM LLP
situs_address
13675 COUNTY ROAD 15
assessed_value
null
land_use_class
residential
staleness_note
assessor roll from annual OIT data call; ownership may be up to 12 months stale
assessor_vintage
2026-01-01
score_components
{"parcel_use":"residential","permitted_uses":["1"],"decree_confidence":0.850000023841858}
Provenance receiptexactly where this detection came from
instance id
siginst_ep_wr_20260718_decree-use-conflict_5749
record
08115-81107010 @ water_parcels
signal
signal:decree-use-conflict
definition
v1
genome
v1 · run run_water_rights_v1
epoch
ep_wr_20260718
lineage status
resolved
detected
2026-07-18 12:00:00
valid from
2026-07-18 12:00:00
source refs
["cdss-structures","cdss-netamounts","cdss-admin-calls","cdss-divrec","co-oit-parcels","nrcs-snotel","openet","water-court-outcomes","ditch-ledger-program"]
Co-firing signalsother detections on this record
PriSignalDetailScore
78Critical call exposureSETTLERS DITCH (1897 priority) carries 2,314.5 day-equivalents of observed call exposure from 54 senior caller(s); dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT (573.1 day-eq). 1879 season-days curtailed in the last five seasons.74.7
78Critical call exposureSETTLERS DITCH (1898 priority) carries 2,314.5 day-equivalents of observed call exposure from 54 senior caller(s); dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT (573.1 day-eq). 1879 season-days curtailed in the last five seasons.74.7
72Critical call exposureSETTLERS DITCH (2003 priority) carries 3,957.7 day-equivalents of observed call exposure from 91 senior caller(s); dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT (573.1 day-eq). 3181 season-days curtailed in the last five seasons.99.4
71Season call nowcast: expected curtailmentSETTLERS DITCH, 2026 season outlook: Apr 1 SWE 61% of median → severe-class year; expected curtailment ~178 of 214 season days from the basin's administration record. Dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT: P(call by Jun 15) = 1 over 6 comparable seasons.100.0
71Season call nowcast: expected curtailmentSETTLERS DITCH, 2026 season outlook: Apr 1 SWE 61% of median → severe-class year; expected curtailment ~178 of 214 season days from the basin's administration record. Dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT: P(call by Jun 15) = 1 over 6 comparable seasons.100.0
66Critical call exposureSETTLERS DITCH (2003 priority) carries 3,947.6 day-equivalents of observed call exposure from 91 senior caller(s); dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT (573.1 day-eq). 3171 season-days curtailed in the last five seasons.99.2
65Season call nowcast: expected curtailmentSETTLERS DITCH, 2026 season outlook: Apr 1 SWE 61% of median → severe-class year; expected curtailment ~212 of 214 season days from the basin's administration record. Dominant caller SOUTH PLATTE RIVER COMPACT: P(call by Jun 15) = 1 over 6 comparable seasons.100.0
51Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16411477 (135 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.90.7
50Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16411451 (124 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 3 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 3 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.99.5
50Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408250 (120 ac, SORGHUM_GRAIN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 3 parcels held by 3 owner(s) — 3 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.99.4
50Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16411421 (120 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.90.4
49Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16413049 (115 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 3 parcels held by 3 owner(s) — 3 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.99.3
49Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408356 (100 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 3 parcels held by 3 owner(s) — 3 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.99.0
48Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408696 (88 ac, SORGHUM_GRAIN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.89.8
47Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408894 (75 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.89.5
46Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16412315 (57 ac, SMALL_GRAINS, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.89.1
45Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16412329 (49 ac, ALFALFA, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.89.0
45Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408697 (36 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.7
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16407982 (28 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.6
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16407387 (23 ac, ALFALFA, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.5
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408514 (22 ac, ALFALFA, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.4
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408443 (22 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.4
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16407107 (19 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 1 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.4
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16415503 (18 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.4
44Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16408103 (18 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.4
43Parcel-split allocation riskIrrigated place D1-2020-16413050 (16 ac, CORN, served by SETTLERS DITCH) now spans 2 parcels held by 2 owner(s) — 2 parcel(s) show NO entitlement instrument of their own. The land split; the water paper didn't.88.3
43Decree-to-current-use conflict2.45 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict6.23 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflictnull ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict154.42 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.58.3
43Decree-to-current-use conflict6.23 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict9 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.61.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict1.8 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflictnull ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict37 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict37 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.64.6
43Decree-to-current-use conflict4.2 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.64.9
43Decree-to-current-use conflict156 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.64.7
43Decree-to-current-use conflict77 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.61.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict8.8 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.64.9
43Decree-to-current-use conflict15.02 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflictnull ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflictnull ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.65.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict68 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.60.6
43Decree-to-current-use conflict1.8 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.64.7
43Decree-to-current-use conflict154.42 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.57.9
43Decree-to-current-use conflict151 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.60.4
43Decree-to-current-use conflict66 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.58.1
43Decree-to-current-use conflict9 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.60.2
43Decree-to-current-use conflict156 ac residential parcel is served by SETTLERS DITCH, whose decree permits only [1]. Development use conflicts with the irrigation decree — a change case is likely required before water follows the project.58.3